|  | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | 
|---|
| ... |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | something | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | This was a pain... but all the coords make much more sense now and a lot of mystery negation has disappeared. | 
| | |  | 
| | 
| 
| 
| | Encompasses determining a route and a distance to travel | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | 
| 
| 
| 
| | This makes more sense when you realise that the existing navigation
workings work on exactly the same type! | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  | 
| | |  |